![]() ![]() If you’ve done so lately, you may be overwhelmed by the annual back-and-forth soap opera about whether Dame will stick in the Rose City or at long last ask for a trade. And with another click, you can read or hear every machination about Lillard’s future there. So you can, with a click, watch every Damian Lillard game with Portland, home and away. ![]() The NBA is more intimate and accessible to millions. Now, that was a long time ago, before League Pass and RSNs brought every team and every player to your big screen, iPad or laptop. Utah was Stockton-to-Malone.Īt just about every NBA outpost, there was a star, and occasionally, a superstar, worth watching. When you do see producers blurring out logos or brand names, it may be because they are trying to avoid an uncertain, lengthy, and expensive trademark litigation between competing parties that have unequal resources.A trip to pre-Tim Duncan San Antonio meant heaping helpings of David Robinson, “The Admiral.” Dallas was Ro Blackman’s city. The motion picture industry would be severely crippled if trademark owners can use their marks to stop real products being shown in films, or even just in films which are not to their liking. How the product is portrayed makes a huge difference for trademark owners, but it does not require filmmakers to seek consent for every use of a mark in his film. There are several limitations on a trademark holder’s ability to successfully assert its trademark rights to prevent the unauthorized use of its trademark in a works of art. "In general, it is not necessary to blur the logos and products of brands in films. Or, if people want to save the extreme amount of scrolling on that page to even get to the bottom, here's the summary: The Conclusion at the very end is interesting. I found this web page, I think the answer is in there somewhere if you are willing to slog through it all. I did some searching, it’s hard to find out a lot about it. Who exactly owns the film rights to MY car/house/etc. Likewise, if they film the outside of my house for a scene, can the architect and/or builder say "Hey, that's my design you're using." For example, if I own a Corvette and rent it to a movie company for use in their film, can GM come back to them and say "Hey, you owe us money for using our car.". The whole idea of "who has the film rights to a particular object" has always been fuzzy to me. Sure, sometimes they are paid for "product placement", but it's not like Williams is going to somehow sue them for having an Attack From Mars in the background. Why do shows cover or alter the game names on the machines? It's not like they cover the name plates on the cars they use - even when they are not being paid by those car companies. So, as long as it's cool with the OP of this thread, pin on your badge and go to work. No one's stopping you from spending the time to do what you said you think will be beneficial here. I've kept the index current, but that's as much as I'm doing here. I asked the OP before I volunteered to index the whole thread, because it was his thread, after all. I volunteered to do just that, we'll see what Robin says. ![]() I think it's worth going through the thread one more time to find out, and give others the courtesy of knowing, too. I do realize that this set of circumstances might be rare maybe the vast majority have complete IDs. It only makes sense to save people time searching for themselves whether a show's games have been identified. ![]() Then I come up with a brilliant idea to do something to save people (who just want to help by the way) time digging for sightings to ID, no site functionality modifications required. So having wasted my time thus, I sort of lost the satisfaction from finding them. So I diligently searched for "piece action" and none of the posts about the episode have the game names, either! Oh, cool! I can contribute! (And I love TOS! I couldn't believe the sighting was incomplete!) So I proceed to spend an hour discovering the game names for myself, which was in itself satisfying, and only my double-checking search for "twenty" in the thread revealed that I had wasted my time, someone beat me to it soon after the LAST time someone reposted the episode. gjm specifically lamented the non-identification when posting about Star Trek earlier, and you helpfully posted "already in the index." So, in good faith, I looked at the Key Post. Hard to tell what the names of the pins are and the machine off to the right.? Getaway: High Speed II, The Williams, 1992.Elvira and the Party Monsters Bally, 1989.Close Encounters of the Third Kind Gottlieb, 1978. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |